|
|
 |
 |
|
Saturday, September 25, 2004
(A Music Review on Linkin Park’s "Meteora")
May Love L. Oniola
It used to be that when I am in one of those moods, the kind that borders between helpless melancholy and suicidal depression, I’d turn to my radio and listen to any of those radio stations playing sappy love songs that empathize with my blue mood. Some say that music sooths the soul – well, I say, that really depends on what kind of music that you listen to, because for my part, whenever I listen to these love songs, instead of soothing me, I feel more agitated, “bluer than blue.” There finally came the time when I got tired of feeling worse after listening to love songs. I decided that I needed the kind of music that’ll still express what I was feeling but will also help me get over that feeling. This decision led me to my discovery of Linkin Park.
Well, actually, Linkin Park songs had been playing inside our house for some time, courtesy of my brother. Linkin Park already had three albums before I learned to appreciate their music. At first, whenever my brother listened to them I’d tell him to pipe down the “noise” because that was all that I heard then – noise: electric guitars whose guitarists seemed to have the worst kind of Parkinson’s disease; the growling-screaming voices that seemed to be an integral part of rock “music;” and those other background noise that I could not quite identify.
But then I read the lyrics of their songs. And I was surprised how accurately the songs were able to say every dark emotion I had inside me – something that no love song has ever been able to say yet! That was when I began to take an interest in the Linkin Park songs, especially with Meteora, their follow-up to their debut album Hybrid Theory.
Meteora got my attention from the other two albums (Hybrid Theory and Reanimation, a collection of remix versions of some of Hybrid Theory) because of the album’s packaging. On the cover of the cassette tape (we didn’t have a CD player yet when my brother bought the tapes and besides, CDs cost too much!) was a guy wearing gas masks, spraying paint on the floor; the picture had a combination of sepia and black colors, which then offered me a picture of an almost subdued but very troubled (read: angry) person. When I read the album’s lyrics, my speculation was proven true: it was an album full of held back anger and despondency of a person towards someone who held power over him or her.
Like the song “Numb.” It begins with the beat that brings to mind the falling of a drop of water on a surface – very peaceful. Then the drum’s sharp beats and the guitar’s wild strums come in to meld quite effortlessly with the beat of the falling water. Chester Bennington begins the song with an almost crooning-pleading voice: “I’m tired of being what you want me to be/ Feeling so faithless/ Lost under the surface/ I don’t know what you’re expecting of me/ Put under the pressure/ Of walking in your shoes/ Every step that I take is another mistake to you.” And in between breaks, Mike Shinoda quietly pipes in with his hip-hop beat: “Caught in the undertow/ Just caught in the undertow,” as though he is the person’s subconscious mind, repeating this line over and over again at the back of his head. Then Chester suddenly breaks into a frenzied growling (like a dog roused from a much needed sleep) for the chorus: “I’ve become so numb/ I can’t feel you there/ Become so tired/ So much more aware/ I’m becoming this/ All I want to do/ Is be more like me/ And be less like you.” With the hoarse screaming voice of Chester, one sees the person pointing an accusing finger to that other person that he hates so much.
Throughout the entire song, Chester and Mike successfully blend in their voices (the rasping, growling and the calm) that create the atmosphere of barely-held-back anger and misery in the song. Whenever I hear this song (indeed, the whole album), I always find myself nodding my head, with my eyes closed, to the beat of the guitar. I let the “angry” voices, the thumping of the bass flow all over me until I feel like I am the one singing the song – pouring out my everything into the song, until the very last beats of the song: the quite falling of water, until nothing more falls.
I think that the charm that this album has on its audience – at least to this audience – is that for each of the cuts in the album, a catharsis happens. The artist and the audience purge all of their dark emotions together, they scream until their voices become hoarse, they bang their heads until they fall down on the floor, and they revel in the feeling of being able to let everything come out in the open, which is really the intention of the album. As Chester Bennington said, the things written in this album happened to them and to the people around them. No one would like to hear them on the radio because they’re dark. But they are important to them.
And it was up to the Linkin Park band to say things that nobody dared to say – it’s like being the bearer of the bad news: nobody in your group wants to do it, but somebody has got to do it – somebody has got to do the dirty work. And you’re it. You’re IT.
Posted at 02:05 am by iskolar
Permalink
Where Cinderella Has Never Gone Before
(A Movie Review on Mark Rosman’s A Cinderella Story)
May Love L. Oniola
One of the things that the retelling of a fairy tale does to the tale itself, say Cinderella, is that the tale becomes more polished, cleaner, in the sense that questions about the tale or some improbable parts in the tale are addressed and given more logical reasoning; the characters are given more depth and become more human; the story becomes more complex, more “life-like” as opposed to its being dream-like. That was what the movie, A Cinderella Story, starred by Hilary Duff (Samantha Montgomery) and Chad Michael Murray (Austin Aimes), did: a Cinderella tale that is applied in the modern times and which addressed one of the most-frequently-asked questions about the tale itself: why Cinderella let herself become enslaved to her step-family’s wishes.
In truth, I was afraid of seeing the same kind of Cinderella (meaning, the one who is usually portrayed in the fairy tales) in the movie A Cinderella Story. I was sick of having a Cinderella who could not stand up for herself. I dreaded seeing Cinderella – or for this instance, Samantha – saying that she’s doing everything she is doing because they (the stepmother and the bitchy stepsisters) are her only family, and she loves them. What a waste of P40! I could have seen this for free on TV where soaps with themes like this abound!
Thankfully, Samantha did not make me hear this piece of junk from her. In one of the opening scenes of the movie, Samantha is seen practicing baseball (or softball – I really could not distinguish the difference between the two) with her best friend, Carter. Carter asks her why she always follows Fiona’s (the stepmother’s) wishes. Why couldn’t she say “no”? And Sam answers: “It’s simple: no Fiona, no money for college.”
When she said this, I slumped on my seat in relief. Finally, a decent answer by a smart Cinderella! I mean, the answer did not give me a big oof! in the gut, but it made a lot of sense. If Sam couldn’t go to Princeton (the school she applied in), she’ll never be able to escape her stepmother. And she admits that life with her stepfamily was hell. (Halleluiah!) And her means of escape from hell was through Princeton.
And this is the other thing about the movie: Samantha’s way of escape was through college and not through marriage. In the fairy tale, Cinderella was only able to escape her stepfamily by marrying the prince. Several movies having Cinderella-like plots also follow the fairy tale’s ending (like the movies Pretty Woman and Maid in Manhattan). Surprisingly, although the movie was faithful to the fairy tale itself (the bitchy stepfamily, the ball, the glass slipper that got left behind, which in this version was a mobile phone), it did not follow that tale to the letter, which I think is a good thing.
Finally, what I really liked most about the movie was that it did not promise forever. Unlike how fairy tales mostly end, A Cinderella Story ended with the girl, Samantha, saying that she really does not know what the future holds. After all, she was only a freshman! She did not promise that she was going to marry Austin (she still got her Prince as her boyfriend) or that she was going to live happily ever after. But she was hopeful for the future, keeping in mind her father’s motto: “Never let the fear of striking out stop you from playing the game.”
The movie really isn’t something that I would put in my list of favorite movies. The actors were good-looking, certainly – there were shots that almost made me want to scream “Stop right there! I’ll just get my camera!” I liked Samantha’s best friend, Carter – I think he was one of the more interesting characters in the movie. But the actors were really not that good. I always got distracted with the way Hilary Duff pouted and bit her lips, and there were instances when I thought she was going to start singing. I think that her lousiest acting was in the locker room scene. Not only were the lines in that scene too exaggerated (they were long lines considering she said that she was in a hurry and she acted like she was about to use the potty), what was worse, I could not feel the emotion from her acting.
But, all in all, the movie was fun to watch. Although A Cinderella Story, as the movie title suggested, it was another Cinderella story, it has some fine points. For one, when Samantha got inside her own car with the prince, she wasn’t bound for the prince’s palace; instead, she was bound for Princeton – now that’s somewhere no Cinderella has ever gone before!
Posted at 01:49 am by iskolar
Permalink
Thursday, September 23, 2004
Laws of Attraction: a review
Film: Laws of Attraction
Cast: Pierce Brosnan, Julianne Moore
Director: Peter Howitt
This is a movie which requires a good memory. If you want to watch this then prepare yourself, drink prime milk or any brain enhancer medicines days before you plan to watch so you won´t forget the story. This is a forgettable romantic comedy with adorable actors but senseless or shall I say cliché story. In short, this is a case wherein Bad movies happen to Good actors.
It is about Audrey Woods (Julianne Moore) and Daniel Rafferty (Pierce Brosnan) as two high-powered divorce attorneys in New York. She is a stereotypically driven working woman who favors business suits, and has forsaken any hope of marriage for a successful law career and she has never lost a case. Daniel, on the other hand, is a romantic and also has never lost a case. They first meet on the opposite sides of the aisle in a divorce case and soon find themselves frequent opponents. Then they accidentally get drunk and find themselves sleep together, even though they hate each other. They go to Ireland to locate the Castle of Rock in which both their clients want to claim and again accidentally, they sleep together and worst, they get married. And they just can´t get divorce because they are divorce attorneys and it may ruin their reputations. Then they realize that they are in love with each other and they get married. That´s all.
There is no fresh or new or challenging part in the story because it is, as I´ve said a while ago, a cliché story. It does not have a plot actually because there are many senseless, unimportant, and weak scenes that are not actually needed in the film. There are trying hard to be funny scenes which actually are not funny. There are also scenes that do not help in the development of the characters. It is like reading Filipino romance novels.
I am not sure of the target audience of this film. If the director of this film, who is Peter Howitt, thinks that this film will leave the audience teary-eyed and wishing they were on screen, he is definitely wrong because this movie sucks. Why hire Julianne Moore for a Britney Spears premise? I mean, Julianne Mooreś characteristic or role in the movie is a divorce lawyer who does not know her actions. I mean, the sex and married thing. It´s like Britney Spears right? And the shocking part in the story is the dialogue of Pierce Brosnan while talking to Moore ¨When you love someone you should be unselfish enough to give them whatever they want.¨ My head wants to blow upon hearing Pierce Brosnan delivering a line such as that.
In fairness, the actors are good, of course. I love Pierce Brosnan and Julianne Moore, reason why I really watch the movie. If you consider yourself as an avid fan of Pierce and Julianne like me, there is a good reason for you to overlook the film´s obvious shortcomings: the duo are really great together. If given another chance to do another movie not like Laws of Attraction, they will surely deliver something truly special. They are really good actors who are stuck in a movie that is not as good as they are.
If you still want to watch this movie, then go on. I am sure that after you watch it, you will surely find this movie guilty for being a crappy movie.
Brecil M. Kempis
Posted at 09:27 pm by iskolar
Permalink
Column Writing
One of our distinguishing traits as Filipinos is our high regard to family ties. Many generations have passed but still our filial bond gets stronger. In different times and places, we find ways to establish and strengthen relationships. We make use of whatever technology could offer in order to bridge distance and space. The different means of communication are indeed helpful in bringing the lives of the Filipinos closer.
Communication has progressed significantly through time. Sometimes, we identify the improvement of a certain time through the advancement of the technologies including the field of communication. It is interesting to note that our communities are increasing their potentials through the modern technologies. What had been impossible before can now be achieved.
I am lucky to have been born in a modern age where almost everything works in just a push of a button. Keeping in touch with my family and friends is easier now compared to the time when my parents were still in college. In 1970s, when my parents pursued their studies in Cebu, the letter was the most common means of communication for the masa who cannot afford pay for expensive phone calls. My father once told me that he seldom kept in touch with his parents who were in Leyte during his college days. He asked for his monthly allowance through letters. Sometimes the money arrived late because the postal service was slow. On the other hand, my mother who was also studying in Cebu used the same way of communicating. When she wanted to make her letter arrive faster in Butuan City, she sent her letters through her friends in the shipping company.
When emergency arises, the telegram was the cheapest way to send an express message. The telegram was the earlier version of the test messages that we have nowadays. The difference is that one has to go to a telegram center and relay the message to an attendant. The attendant is responsible in writing the message in short cut. The charge depends on the number of words in the message. The shorter the message is the cheaper is the payment. I remembered the time when my father received a telegram from Leyte informing him of the death of my grandmother. The message was: Uli Leyte. Nanay patay gahapon. -Tatay. Sometimes telegram messages are funny to read but I realized that its modern counterpart, the text messages are funnier. Well, it shows that we Filipinos are creative in putting down words whether in a paper or in a cellphone screen.
Another unique way of relaying urgent message with less cost is through the panawagan service in radio stations. This is very popular in provincial areas where there were no modern facilities yet. My maternal grandmother is fond of this. She always went to the local radio station and gave her message to the radio announcer. The disadvantage of this method is that, when the recipient of the message is not listening to radio during panawagan portion, he/she would surely miss the message.
The telephone is the most convenient way of keeping in touch with someone, especially if there’s an emergency. In my Bislig, during the 1980s, only the rich could afford this necessity. Most of the people went to calling stations in order communicate. In the 1990s, these calling stations installed fax machines so their costumers can have another option.
The advent of the internet in computers and cellular phones made way to a faster and more advanced way of communicating domestically and internationally. Most of us now prefer to send our messages through e-mail. People could now talk through on-line and voice chat. A web cam is an advantage because one can see the other person who he/she is communicating with on the computer monitor. I keep in touch with my friends in high school through Friendster.com and other e-groups. There are many websites in the internet that gives one linkages to friends, families, companies and other networks. Moreover, my parents could now track me anytime, anywhere through text or call using the cell phone. Nowadays, pen pals become text mates and chat mates. Friendship, family ties and other associations can now be managed with just a few clicks. Even marriage proposal now becomes instant.
The impressive changes in the field of communication in some ways improved relationship. Distance is no longer a problem. We can now be connected with our loved ones as frequent and as fast as we could. Connecting Lives, a cellphone company uses this slogan promoting their communication gadgets. As time pass by, the tools of communication are getting more sophisticated. We can now have more options in keeping in touch with everyone around the world. These advancements, if used appropriately, could make the bond of relationships even stronger.
Time can testify how much the Filipinos give much importance to a trait that is now slowly dying in other parts of the world. In different faces and in different means, we uphold the value of relationships, especially family relationships. We could only hope that as our world becomes more modern and complicated, this value will never change and would always be cherished by every Filipino.
Charisse Mae Ampo
Posted at 06:52 pm by iskolar
Permalink
Wednesday, September 22, 2004
Once upon a time, not so long ago, a timeless tale was modernized. Cinderella became ‘diner girl’, the price charming became a football team captain, the wicked stepsisters became valley girls, the royal ball turned into a Halloween Homecoming Dance and the glass slipper switched into a cell phone.
“A Cinderella Story”, the teenage romantic comedy is a contemporary version of an old story Cinderella. It depicts a realistic teen life and creates a dreamlike picture of a world for many romantic teens. Directed by Mark Rosman and written by the amateur writer Leigh Dunlop, “A Cinderella Story” did fine in the box office for its first week of showing but the word-of -mouth of its disillusioned viewers and covered by more attractive film options lead to its drop-off by the second week.
In the movie, the teenage sensation Hilary Duff (“Lizzie Mcguire”) play Sam Montgomery, an orphan who is banished to the attic of the San Fernando Valley home of her shallow, hilariously self-absorbed step-mom Fiona (Jennifer Coolidge), forced to work at the family diner, treated more as a servant rather than a member of the family and doesn’t get synchronized swimming lessons like her talent-less and wickedly dumb step sisters (Andrea Avery and Madeline Zima) – all in the hope that Fiona will send her to Princeton for her efforts.
The Cinderella Sam work hard at home, at school and at their roller diner with the hope in getting into Princeton and spends time text messaging and talking to her secret admirer and prince charming on-line a.k.a. Nomad who turn out to be the King of high school, the captain of the football team, student body president and the campus heartthrob (of course!). Sam and her prince already engage in anonymous e-mail romance and have agreed to meet at the Halloween Homecoming Dance. She turned out in mask, they shared intimate moments and when she leaves at midnight to get back to the diner, she has left behind her cell phone with a lock feature in it (a characteristics a shoe doesn’t have. Haha!).
,The theme of the film itself had been used by many other movies. But the wonderful point of the movie is that it is able to depict a Cinderella life on this contemporary time. Taking note that even though Sam stayed at the attic of their house, the movie turn the attic into a comfortable room just like the other teenager’s room living a normal life. And even if she works in the diner, she had a car, a cell phone, and even had a computer in her room. Well that could say much on how the movie re-invented Cinderella these days.
Also, the first- time writer Leigh Dunlop quietly did a nifty job in making the valley girls and the step-mom a little bit funny though the whole movie wasn’t ingenious enough. The film also changed the character of the prince charming Austin Ames, who was supposed to be a man of character yet turned out to be afraid of his dad, in a dead-end relationship with a shallow cheerleader (Julie Gonzalo), easily cowed by his buddies and unable to pursue his Cinderella. Those were just some of the notable changes in the movie.
However, evaluating the whole movie itself, one could not get away in associating it with other films of the same theme. Like the character of Cinderella in “Ever After” played by the charming actress Drew Barrymore, was a more adventurous, assertive and active one compared to Sam in “A Cinderella Story”. Sam was also portrayed as a teen outcast in their school yet her fair physical appearance with Duff’s figure flattering tops, expertly ironed hair and the confidence she projected in the film completely did not suit her underdog character. On the other hand, the assertive, adventurous, courageous and compelling attitude of Danielle (Drew Barrymore in “Ever After”) somehow suited to the actively charming beauty of Drew. The gutsy, intelligent, appealing Danielle of “Ever After” somehow captivated the heart and senses of the audiences more than the puppy attitude of Sam. “Ever After” was intelligently humorous, suspenseful and romantic compared to the latest “A Cinderella Story” which somehow lost its magic and guts with some of its over-acting and forced humor through the least inspired characters of geeky, wicked step sisters and the constrained and non-particularly funny Botox obsessed step-mom.
Girls would surely be cheering more for Danielle (“Ever After”) in giving her stepsisters the black eye and for carrying the handsome prince Henry (Dougray Scott) on her back than the lowly Sam who showed her courage at the later part of the movie.
“A Cinderella Story” was neither a piece of crap nor one terrible film, just a disappointingly pleasant one. I tried not to read any reviews of the film before I watched it in order not to create a preesupposed impression of it. However, its give-away title and movie billboards somehow created a standard of expectation within my mind. The hot lad Murray on one way or another sustained me on my seat. But the inappropriate blend of Duff and Murray made me so uncomfortable and created an insipid taste on my drink. But like most of the film critics were saying, “A Cinderella Story” was not really noteworthy and not really bad but has enough cheesiness and stupidity in it.
"A Cinderella Story” somehow offered me a nice smile on my lips and a little smirk. But in the end it made me realize that I may be a teenage on-line, but Sam would definitely not the kind of Cinderella I wanted to be!
Armela O. Gertos
Movie Review
Posted at 07:58 pm by iskolar
Permalink
Album : II Artist : THE CALLING
PROPS FOR II Rowena Rose M. Lee
Except for unimaginative title, II is a boss album that is very pop rock and very Savage-Garden-meets-Hootie-And-The-Blowfish. THE CALLING’S second album has a lot of bass downpour and is a percussion spanking collection of songs that range from social commentaries to the ol’ lovey-dovey tunes. It deserves to be played at full volume anywhere, even and especially if your septuagenarian grandmother is house visiting. II is a musical performance that robs anyone the volition to disengage from the head bobbing experience. Of course, THE CALLING isn’t complete without Alex Max Band’s rich but rough orgasm-inducing baritone.
The conception of II sees the departure of all but Alex Band and Aaron Kamin. 23-year-old Band and 27-year-old Aaron Kamin stress in a press release dated April 1, 2004 that II is a reference to the “band having two principals” (MTV News). This is in response to a lawsuit that former THE CALLING member Billy Mohler and Nate Wood filed last year.
Kamin’s musical genius is felt throughout the entire album. For II, he plays acoustic, lead and bass guitars. He plays the organ and the piano. He plays the percussions. He also mixes and pre-programs almost half of the songs in II. He even does a cameo in track 11 Your Hope. His speaking voice announces in the background “There’s so many things we just don’t know about,” and “I think we all know what its like to feel alone.”
II is also markedly different from the string and drum work on CAMINO PALMERO, THE CALLING’S first album (2001). II’s synthesizers and computer mix are liver thumping that moves consciously on the path of the (now disbanded) Australian-based band Savage Garden.
Last August, THE CALLING released its second single.
Band croons amidst the plucking scales of the lead guitar, “So take my hand / don’t let me surrender / ‘cause maybe someday / in time / things will go my way.” The song carries as much angst as the next post-pubescent-but-not-yet-quite-into-adulthood song but Band’s low and jagged ranting is enough to make people think, “Hey yeah, this is my song.”
As with the first album, THE CALLING comments on the plight of the homeless in the States. One by One (track 1) however is less jaded than We're Forgiven (2001). One by One is more hopeful, preachy even, about how one person can make a difference in the world. This train of thought is echoed in the songs Believing (track 5) and Our Lives (track 2).
Apparently, such heartbreaking sentimental songs (like Wherever You Will Go, Could It Be Any Harder and Stigmatized ) are not to be included in II. The love songs in the new album in fact, bear whimsical themes and have feel-good touches as that of Chasing the Sun (track 4) and Dreaming in Red (track 10). Anything (track 6) is a love song that bests describes stalker obsession.
Darker songs like Your Hope, Somebody Out There (track 8) and If Only (track 7) are commendable less for their messages but more for their tempi. These songs go the way of Freshmen (Verve Pipe), Heaven (Live) and Let Her Cry (Hootie and the Blowfish). In extreme transmutation however, THE CALLING’S Surrender pretty much has the sentimentality of Backstreet Boy’s The Call.
II is for the aficionados of pop rock – the likes of Creed, Matchbox Twenty and Lifehouse. It is of course not as bone-jarring as Korn or Kid Rock but definitely a million times better than The Cardigans and Richard Ashcroft. At the very least, THE CALLING”S album can pull a body into a sway or into an air drumming session. But heck, it’s good enough to give grandma an orgasm or two.
Posted at 07:17 pm by iskolar
Permalink
A CINDERELLA STORY: A CONTEMPORARY FAIRYTALE
The classic fairytale gets a modern makeover in Warner Bros. newest romantic teen flick movie, A Cinderella Story directed by Mark Rosman. Nothing changed in the plot of the Grimm Brothers’ version of the story. One could even guess what the story is all about by just watching the movie thrillers. Almost everything in the story is a cliché. I think the Cinderella complex thing is too exhausted by other fairytale-based movies which come out together with the A Cinderella Story. However, what made this movie click among the teenagers is the modern and cute packaging of the story.
The story was simply updated and transformed. The movie was set in a sunny Californian town of San Fernando Valley instead of the magical far away land. Samantha Montgomery (Hillary Duff), a tomboyish girl is Cinderella living in the attic furnished with bedroom necessities and a computer set. She lived with her mean stepmother (Jennifer Coolidge) and stepsisters (Andrea Avery and Madeline Zima) who inherited her father’s properties. Sam didn’t only run for errands at home but also serve as waitress and utility worker in her stepmother’s diner. In this story, Cinderella went to school with her step-sisters who were trying hard to be popular and beautiful.
Sam’s prince is Austin Ames (Chad Michael Murray), a football quarterback and the school heartthrob. They were first met on-line friends and eventually became text mates. Instead of a royal ball where the lovers supposed to meet, there was a Halloween dance. Sam was dressed like Cinderella in the fairytale and Austin was dressed as a prince. Sam’s fairy godmother was the diner’s manager (Regina King) who constantly encouraged her to believe in herself. She sends her off to the Halloween party on her convertible instead of a pumpkin coach. Sam’s cell phone alarmed at midnight and she rushed off to get back to the diner. Instead of a glass slipper, she left behind her cell phone. Austin was optimistic in finding his princess. On the other hand, his former girlfriend (Julie Gonzalo), the snob cheerleader, was also desperately tracking down the mystery girl who stole her boyfriend.
As expected the movie ends happily. The protagonists were able to conquer against all odds. Likewise, the villains in the movie got the “punishment” that they deserved. Sam ended up with Austin after discovering the truth and the sincerity of their feelings. Their love is “the rain amidst the drought”.
Aside from the predictable and cheesy parts, one could also notice the weird probabilities in the movie. For one, it is impossible for a pretty girl like Sam not to attract attention from her schoolmates. Another instance is that her schoolmates always tease Sam because she works in a diner while Austin who works in a gasoline station didn’t get one. The story also emphasized obviously the contrast between the different characters in the movie. It appeared that Sam and the diner’s manager are the only likable characters while the rest were portrayed as either funny or nasty. Well, that’s what movies are in the first place.
A Cinderella Story is a romantic fairytale movie that does not only focus in finding Prince Charming but also in achieving self-empowerment. It is a good thing to note that in spite of all the sappy parts which could make someone’s eyes roll, one could learn some lessons of boosting the self-esteem amidst discouragements (and getting even with the “evil ones”).
If you’re the type who loves to watch cutie-cutie movies that could give you a good laugh and some giggles, then A Cinderella Story is perfect for you. But if you’re the type who looks for epiphanies in movies, just watch the thrillers and you’ll get the whole story.
-Charisse Mae T. Ampo
Posted at 05:16 pm by iskolar
Permalink
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
A short profile
He walks out of glass doors, combing the crowded atrium for his friends, his left hand clutching the strap of his Lego knapsack, his other hand scratching the back of his head. Every time he comes from class, he gives an impression of someone perpetually in awe, this unmistakable look of wonder and naïveté on his face. Yes, he looks like someone you immediately want to punch in the face. In is rubber sneakers, he walks as if he’s impersonating a penguin, or a giddy dodo bird resurrected from extinction, flashing his teeth at the people he passes by. But when he’s down, as what I have been told, he’ll maintain a stiff face for the rest of the day, the confident spoken English he’s known for will be gone—when in a bad mood, he tends to go monosyllabic.
“Are you okay,” asks a friend.
“Yeah,” he replies, failing to fake a smile.
“Why the face?”
“Hungry.”
“Want to eat at the canteen?”
“No.”
“I thought you were hungry.”
“Must go home.”
“Are you ill?”
“Just tired.”
Everyone who knows him believes he’s a smart person, these acquaintances conceding that his intellect is a cut above theirs. Two years ago when I first met him, I also thought that I was in the presence of someone smart. But that sort of dwindled when I saw him speak at the launching of the college literary journal; he introduced a latest addition to the Kombuyahan genus, a small troupe of guitarists that call themselves kwerdas. As it was the launching of a literary journal, I didn’t particularly expect them to play hair-raising pieces such as “More Than Words.” To make things more interesting…
“I believe that I have the fire in me,” the young string instrumentalist announced in a room full of hungry people.
“Sir Joey and I talked about the fire. And I believe in the fire.”
Someone in the audience cringed in his seat. It wasn’t me.
One probably perplexing thing about him: most of his friends are girls. Not just chair-hogging know-it-alls in the library, but pretty, terrific-smelling girls that a fratman would fantasize about. Some might call him lucky: he doesn’t even have to buy them lunch or treat them to a scary movie at SM. They flock around him, a congregation of attractive and preppy teenagers ready to bend over his will. Okay, maybe that was an awful hyperbole. Girls just like being around him, hang out with him, these Communication Arts sophomores popular for their nymphet allure in the campus. Their dashing little Humbert Humbert: him and his big puff of curly hair.
“Do these girls find him attractive?” I ask one of his female friends.
“Nah,” she answers, pouting her lips. “They just like to hang out. He has a good personality and girls like that in a guy.”
“But has he ever made a move on any of his girl friends?”
She chuckles. “Maybe. He used to make porma with one of them. And she didn’t like it.”
“He creeps her out?” I added.
“It’s just that they have issues, okay. They don’t talk with each other anymore.”
One of his friends once confessed that he is a troubled person. He likes staying in the dorm because home doesn’t seem to feel like one anymore. He kills time after classes, avoiding the trip back to his house. He busies himself with kwerdas, spends time with his loyal friends at the dried-up water fountain, talking about the profound and nonsense, whining about college while throwing stones at stray dogs. He strums his guitar for anyone that’s willing to listen, plays a thrilling game of chess with a relative stranger.
For a college guy, he is a quite a creep. He makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand whenever he grins at me on the path walk and say, “Greetings.”
When I see him, the first thing that comes to my find is fruitcake; he simply reminds me of one. Tart and spongy. Someone once referred to him as Sponge Bob, the famous Nickelodeon character. I frowned upon hearing this and later marveled at the appropriateness of the term. And then I discovered he actually liked being associated with a cartoon sponge. Now whenever we stumble into each other, I wait for him to transmogrify into a giant yellow sponge who sounded like he recently OD’d on Prozac.
The day I approached him, he wore a white Rebisco Cream Sandwich t-shirt that was too large for him, his thick, chunky hair protected by a khaki fisherman’s hat, an acoustic guitar strapped to his back.
“Do you still have class?”
He turned around and I notice a black pen clipped to his shirt’s collar. “Nope. Anything I can do?”
I was about to ask my first question when I got distracted by a yellowing pimple on his jaw.
What I admire about him is that no matter what happens, he ends up endearing. On Deviance Day a year ago, he showed up looking like Dhobie, wearing a brown towel ripped to shreds, his skin smeared with charcoal. No one laughed at him; he did look ridiculous but he held it with pride. He even grabbed the microphone that evening and declared to everyone that he felt so deviant he should win the title.
He didn’t. But a girl who wore nothing but a cardboard box did.
What drove him to do it, to act so fearless in front of everyone you’d actually believe in him? No wonder his friends admire him. He could wear a boy scout t-shirt to school and not care. He could look like a hobo, sound like an alien invader from another dimension. He could act like a total freak and he wouldn’t give a rat’s ass. In fact, he would gladly do that classic Sponge Bob impression, coax the show’s theme from his reliable guitar and walk away contented. So what’s the big secret? Between you and me, I think it’s “the fire.”
John Bengan
Posted at 05:52 am by iskolar
Permalink
Monday, September 20, 2004
movie review: Remember with Lacuna you can Forget
Remember with Lacuna you can Forget
Review: Eternal Sunshine of the spotless Mind
Director: Michel Gondry
Story: Charlie Kaufman
Remember, with Lacuna you can forget1. The lacuna Inc. staff has made giant strides in brain research. They have discovered a simple and effective way to remove problem memories. No longer do you have to live with life debilitating memories. Live again, take the steps now!
Step one: the initial meeting
The first meeting with Dr. Mierzwiak serves primarily as an introductory meeting where the patient will be given a tour of the facility and the chance to meet the staff. After that, the patient will sit down with the doctor to fully understand the problem and tailor a procedure that is best suited for the patient. 2
Step two: preparing for the procedure
After the patient decides what memory he/she wants to be erased, the patient is instructed to collect any items that would remind him/her of the experience to be erased. These mementos would then be destroyed after the procedure. This is to ensure that the patient won’t have any unexplainable items after the process of memory erasure.Step three: mapping the memory
The team of Lacuna experts will use the information they have received and the items brought to create a map of the memory, useful in extracting the memory from the mind.3
Step four: the procedure
Following the map of the patient’s memory, the doctor and his team4 will begin to erase the unwanted memory. The process works on reverse timeline: beginning with the most recent memories and goes backwards in time. This approach is designed to target the emotional core that every memory is built upon. By exterminating the core, Dr. Mierzwiak is able to make the entire memory vanish.5
When the patient wakes up from the procedure, they remember nothing.6
_________________
1The contents of this review is a Frankenstein of ads for Lacuna Inc., reviews of the movie Eternal sunshine, and a tedious discourse of a hack powered by coffee and cigarettes. By the way, lacuna means empty space.
2Jim Carrey stars as Joel Barish, a wimpy wage slave who falls in love with an unstable free-spirited bohomie named Clementine Kruczynski (played by Kate Winslet) whose hair color is as volatile as the stock market. He then learns that after some time, Clementine undergoes the procedure first, after Joel wanted to avoid the taxing relationship. Now Joel wants to undergo the same procedure to forget; to rescue the damsel in distress from the tower created by his mind.
3The movie’s central story is about what’s going on inside Joel’s head during the procedure. It is here that the director and the scriptwriter lavishly puts us into layers of creative and insightful notions. Unlocking the secrets, the study of neurosis and the slanting of real life experiences is this movie’s piece- de- resistance. Kaufman finally made a script that is fragmented like an Orson Wells’ movie yet achingly and deceivingly beautiful like an amber setting sun. The makers succeeded in making a movie that sucks viewers into a Coney Island fieldtrip inside the mind (think Being John Malkovich) yet one doesn’t question what’s the point? We all just watch like a voyeur.
4Merswiak( played by Tom Wilkinson), the staff, Stan and Patrick (Mark Ruffalo, and Elijah Wood) and the receptionist, Mary (played Kirsten Dunst) who also have subplots of their own—Patrick gets creepy laughs as he tries to wooing Clementine with stolen memories and Mierzwiak with his dark melancholic presence in a clinic that looks like a dentist’s clinic. Stan finds dramatic nuances in comedic situations. Mary‘s a wounded soul who has a crush on the doc.
5Joel, in the middle of the process of erasure, realizes that the moments with Clementine were bittersweet and precious and thus he tries to store them in the wrong side of his brain—in his childhood memories although she was never played a single part—thus, the process becomes very messy as the techies try to zero-in on the memory.
6The movie revolves around two premises: a poem by Alexander Pope (Eloisa to Abelard):
How happy is the blameless Vestal’s lot!
The world is forgetting, by the world forgot.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray’r accepted, and each wish resign’d.
And a part of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil, part VII: “Blessed are the forgetful: for they shall have done with their stupidities too.” I think they were quoted by Mary in the film, and both tells us that love, whether predestined for doom or bliss, doesn’t matter as long as we enjoy the moments shared. In the end of the movie, Joel falls in-love again with Clementine. Eternal sunshine of the spotless Mind almost captures the complexities of the human struggle of the heart to love even at the stake of committing the same follies. One more thing, everybody loves a love story.
--Romel Villaflor
Posted at 10:47 pm by iskolar
Permalink
FIFTEEN MINUTES WITH THE GUY-I-DON'T-KNOW-HIS-NAME
FIFTEEN MINUTES WITH THE GUY-I-DON'T-KNOW-HIS-NAME
(felt like forever!)
By Shiella A. Ildefonso
01-61271
Early Monday morning, I found myself sitting alone by the fountain at the Atrium. There were only more or less fifteen students who stayed at the fountain's area. From where I sat, fronting the entrance door to the Admin building, there were about ten students at my right and the rest were somewhere facing the IT office and to the stairs going to the library. The students in my right were looking at me, I could feel the eyes looking at me while I was sitting there as if I was lost or I was new in the place or something. Then I heard one asked the other, “upperclass na siya?”, and one guy answered him, “dili uy, diba ning-dagan man na siya ug councilor?”, and inside my head I want to answer “ngano mura ko ug first year?”. But I continued opening my black folder, looking whether my papers to be passed for my thesis were there. It was so funny when I had to pretend that as if I was not listening to their conversation, since after checking my folder, there was nothing else to do but to eavesdrop(and I then realized, I had to, for this article.) and besides, I was still gathering my strength to face my adviser.
“Hay, kapoya aning dug-on ko uy!” a girl said while adjusting her blue jogging pants as she stood in front of one of the guys. She was the only female in the group.
“Kapoy gyud na noh, bug-at siguro na imong ginasuk-suk sa imong panty?” a tall musculed-gay with a mustache, wearing his PE uniform, and by saying that he looked at me as I looked at him, shocked with his reaction.
“Gyud!” the girl said while holding the sides of her jogging pants like of a skirt.
And everybody laughed. I assumed they were Computer Science students. I knew one of them, Gian, who was a member of the Bayla Vinta. And they looked like they were from their PE class, since all of them were wearing their PE uniforms and were most probably they were resting by the fountain.
They were talking and talking and laughing of things the muscled-gay was talking. I couldn't remember his jokes but for sure all of them were green jokes. He was talking so fast like he was running after something. He was eating his words like supposedly saying "Asa mo nag-adto?", he would say " Asmo'g-to?" (Like, ha?) And he had many expressions almost every after sentence, like "haller", "galore”, “char lang!”. He also added word to the expression “charmus” with “charmus-ginamus-iring-gigakus!”. And his laughter was totally torturing me to death. His voice was so harsh that he tried to sound like of a sweet lady, like when he said “Ay, 'Day”. He sounded terrible. Not mentioning his mustache.
"Hoy! Naa na mo? Naka-himo na mo?" guy in red shirt and black shorts and rubber slippers interuppted while holding his backpack unto his chest.
"Wala pa intawon oi!" the girl in jogging pants said to her blocmates as they were looking at her with smiling faces.
"Bitaw oi, mabuang na ko ani! Hay! Kapoy na kaayo! Daghan kaayo ug assignment bah! Naglibog na ko kung unsa ang unahon! Mabuang na ko ani! Naka-study na mo?" the muscled-gay with a mustache spontaneously ranted as he stood in front of one guy who was wearing white shirt and maroon jogging pants. Only then I noticed that there was another guy who was lying on the pebble-cemented mouth of the fountain pool, where he was facing to the oblation. He was wearing yellow shirt and maong pants. He used some of his blocmates bag as his pillow and said, "Ah, kaya lagi na. Na-kaya gani sa atong mga upperclass."
And they were silent. I wondered why. Although my head bowed as I was as if texting someone, I felt that they were looking at me. Then, feeling superior, I looked at them, and found that they were indeed looking at me. Then I hurriedly grabbed my bag and my black folder and went inside the building. Pretending that it was as if it was time to go in the building.
Upon entering by the guard's table, I heard one commented, "Bitaw". I might not had see who said it but the voice was familiar. I know it was that muscled-gay with a mustache, I somehow got used with his voice, even for that fifteen-mintue stay at the fountain area. His voice was ringing in my ears like the way my crush called my name. But this time, he was not my crush and I don't even know his name.
Posted at 09:37 am by iskolar
Permalink
|
|

A good essay must have this permanent quality about it; it must draw its curtain round us, but it must be a curtain that shuts us in not out. ~Virginia Woolf~
|
|